This idea is really a variation on
the theme of chosen family, but it’s one that seems more common among celibate
communities. This idea is one that, to me, could be just as good as the first,
and feel more realistic, since it has fewer moving parts. The model looks
something like this:
Kitchen
|
?
|
Common
Bed
|
Art Studio/ Office
|
|
|
|
|
A (Me)
|
|
Living Room/
|
Dining Room
|
B+C
|
|
|
|
This
model can be summarized as “traditional monogamous romantic/sexual pair with an
additional single person grafted on.” and it seems to me that this type of
relationship is harder to separate from the romance supremacy culture - as
evidenced by the summary. However, I’ve talked to people in this type of
relationship, and that in itself says something about the plausibility of this
type of relationship. This relationship subtype has a lot in common with the
larger chosen family type: The long-term nature, the focus on the set of
relationships as a whole, with each member an equal, etc.
I
retained the common bed in this model even though this scenario makes that
possibility less likely, it still stands for an ideal level of physical
intimacy in a family relationship. The question mark remains in the diagram
because even though this is a more trod path, every relationship is unpredictable,
and also because I’m almost certainly forgetting important aspects of good
relationship.
This
model’s strength is in the plausibility and in the size of the community that
can be formed. The drawback is the anxiety around the relationship between the
romantic/sexual couple and the single person, since society will privilege the
romantic/sexual relationship over their relationship to the single person, the
single person might always have a fear that the couple might leave them or
treat them as a less important part of the whole. I’ve spent less time thinking
about this model over the first one, but I can definitely see the appeal of
fewer moving pieces and possibly the depth of relationship that can form
between three people as opposed to six or more, but on the other hand the other
model’s distance from the norm adds a sort of commitment to that distance that
this model doesn’t intrinsically entail.
No comments:
Post a Comment